A simple method to score WORLD reversal is described. It is easy to operationalise and simple to use at the bedside.
Beneath the correct reversed response of DLROW, write the numbers 12345. The numbers below represent the respective letters above. The score for the WORLD reversal response is equivalent to the number of digits within the patient’s response that has the most ascending digits (while not focusing on the exact order of the digits).
The website could also be used to check WOR(L)D reversal scores in other languages by appropriate substitution of the letters to the equivalent letter position for WORLD. For example, the EARN response (Italian) mentioned above would translate to DORL in English. Enter DORL into computerised scoring above yields a score of 2.
English
|
WORLD
|
D
|
L
|
R
|
O
|
W
|
French
|
MONDE
|
E
|
D
|
N
|
O
|
M
|
Italian
|
CARNE
|
E
|
N
|
R
|
A
|
C
|
Polish
|
SWIAT
|
T
|
A
|
I
|
W
|
S
|
German
|
RADIO
|
O
|
I
|
D
|
A
|
R
|
German
|
PREIS
|
S
|
I
|
E
|
R
|
P
|
Spanish / Portugese
|
MUNDO
|
O
|
D
|
N
|
U
|
M
|
Assigned Number
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Five digit number reversal scoring
Sometimes, the reversal of a five digit number is tested rather than the reversal of a five letter word or serial seven subtractions. (In some languages it is not possible to reverse a five letter world.) Each digit is a choice of one of ten numbers (zero to nine) with none repeated. The scoring principle is the same as for letter reversal scoring where the correct reversed number corresponds to 1-2-3-4-5.
For example, reverse number 4-2-7-3-1.
The correct number reversal is 1-3-7-2-4. The correct reversal 1-3-7-2-4 will correspond to numbers 1-2-3-4-5 respectively.
1 3 7 2 4
1 2 3 4 5
Thereafter, digit reversal responses are scored similar to WORLD reversal scoring.
IN CONCLUSION:
There are two principles when scoring WOR(L)D or number reversal:
1. replace the reversed WORLD (or other word or digit) response with digits 1-2-3-4-5 as follows:
D L R O W
1 2 3 4 5
2. The score for the WORLD reversal response is equivalent to the number of digits within the patient’s response that has the most ascending digits (while not focusing on the exact order of the digits).
Once one is adept at scoring attention tests, it is unlikely that one would resort to computing the scores with this technique, as most skilled scorer’s will recognize the flow of the numbers or letters to provide a correct score quite quickly on viewing the patient’s reply. Nevertheless, it is always prudent to know how to check the score, either by solving it with the system described above or with the computerised scoring at this website.
OTHER ATTENTION TESTS
Scoring serial seven subtractions from 100 requires each answer to be scored on its own merit. For example, a response of 93-90-83-60-50 scores 2 out of 5 as the first and third subtractions are correct. The Serial 7's scoring tool above assists with the scoring of up to five subtractions from 100, 90 or 80. One may also use this tool to train oneself with serial seven subtractions technique.
Some patients seem to be less perplexed by this test when the question is posed as follows: “Spend seven dollars from a hundred dollars, and keep spending seven dollars from the remain.” Stop the subtractions after five responses.
Scoring days of the week backwards is similar to scoring serial seven subtractions. Patients are asked to recite the days of the week in sequential backward order. One may start at any day of the week. Five responses are scored and 1 point is given for each correct answer.
The other attention tests mentioned above are well described in the literature and may be used by the clinician.
THE LONGITUDINAL USE AND SCORING OF ATTENTION TESTS
Firstly, in patients with Alzheimer's disease, an average annual decline of MMSE score is 3.3 points per year. MMSE scores may improve 1.2 points with cholinesterase inhibitors after 12 weeks. Furthermore, a decline of three or more points on the MMSE within a six month period identifies a group of individuals with worse clinical outcomes. The attention test score contributes 17% of the MMSE and the incorrect scoring of attention tests can result in a score error of up to four points. Errors in attention test scoring are within the range of the changes described. Hence, scoring errors may imply incorrect clinical information about the patient’s progress. Whenever a MMSE score is better or worse, one should review two issues:
1. Are the two MMSE tests scoring the same items? (for example, are the attention tests administered in both tests the same?)
2. Are the components of the cognitive screen scored correctly?
Secondly, consider the following clinical scenario: An English speaking patient of French descent has a cognitive disorder and scores 5 points for WORLD reversal on a cognitive screen. Eighteen months later he is unable to spell WORLD forwards even with cuing. The clinician notes that the patient can spell the French word MONDE correctly and he scores 3 points for MONDE reversal. What score should one provide for the attention test?
It is not uncommon for clinicians to use other attention tests when there is a problem with the initial test. A score of zero points for the attention test is reasonable as he could not do WORLD reversal any longer, reflecting his cognitive decline, rather than a score of 3 points for MONDE reversal. Going forward, one should continue to score WORLD reversal for the cognitive screen and one may use MONDE reversal score as an additional attention test, but the latter is not scored as part of the cognitive screen.
Thirdly, it is important to recognise that five letter reversal scores may be different for different words in the same patient, and these scores may also be different from serial seven subtraction scores, days of the week reversal scores and five digit reversal scores. To this end, it would be helpful if the clinician would document the name and score of the attention test used when reporting the total score of the cognitive screen. For example: “The patient scored 20 out of 30 on the MMSE with a score of 3 out of 5 on WORLD reversal”. This will provide consistency in attention testing when performing cognitive tests longitudinally, especially when the original cognitive test document is not available for review.